• Welcome to PurpleFlock! Sign up here so that you can chat with your fellow Ravens fans.

The WR Thread

Sooky said:
I agree with this I think he is drafted way higher than people expect. Definitely has that home run ability that teams are looking for.
Click to expand...
Yeah. I'm pretty sure he goes in the first round. Wouldn't be surprised if we drafted him at 16, although I'd rather trade down.
 
DeVito52 said:
You aren't feeling Ridley as much because you are allowing everyone else's opinion to change yours.
Click to expand...
Everyone else? Im the only one here that doesn't want ridley. Everyone else would be over the moon to get him at 16. I think he falls to the second round
 
arnie_uk said:
Everyone else? Im the only one here that doesn't want ridley. Everyone else would be over the moon to get him at 16. I think he falls to the second round
Click to expand...

I think I would be more amped for guice at 16 than Ridley. 2nd round is where we should get a wideout. Followed by a 3rd round haha.

1. Guice
2. Anthony miller
3. Gallup / ateman / Hamilton
 
DeVito52 said:
I don't want anything to do with a RB in the 1st round.
Click to expand...

There’s 2 type of raven fans. The fans who think flacco is elite. And fans who see flacco as mediocre / inconsistent. I’m the 2nd. I just feel like a game changing rb is more valuable to this team than a game changing WR.
 
Davesta said:
There’s 2 type of raven fans. The fans who think flacco is elite. And fans who see flacco as mediocre / inconsistent. I’m the 2nd. I just feel like a game changing rb is more valuable to this team than a game changing WR.
Click to expand...

this statement is missing an incredible amount of nuance - what about all the fans who think that flacco is trash - or what about the fans who see flacco as good but inconsistent...

and what about oline vs rb vs wr... or more importantly as with everything in the draft your decisions/evaluations shouldnt be positional unless youve taken into account the specifics - it should be which player do you want more not which position...
 
Davesta said:
There’s 2 type of raven fans. The fans who think flacco is elite. And fans who see flacco as mediocre / inconsistent. I’m the 2nd. I just feel like a game changing rb is more valuable to this team than a game changing WR.
Click to expand...
There is no value selecting RB in 1st.
 
Davesta said:
There’s 2 type of raven fans. The fans who think flacco is elite. And fans who see flacco as mediocre / inconsistent. I’m the 2nd. I just feel like a game changing rb is more valuable to this team than a game changing WR.
Click to expand...
This is just so wrong lol
 
Oh please. Flacco isn’t perfect but the Jags would’ve probably made the super bowl if you switched him and Bortles. Flacco was the catalyst for our super bowl victory. Bortles shot his team in the foot repeatedly and cost them a super bowl appearance. See where I’m goimg with this?
 
Lost_In_Translation said:
Oh please. Flacco isn’t perfect but the Jags would’ve probably made the super bowl if you switched him and Bortles. Flacco was the catalyst for our super bowl victory. Bortles shot his team in the foot repeatedly and cost them a super bowl appearance. See where I’m goimg with this?
Click to expand...

bortles vs the bills was one of the historic worst qb performances in a playoff game ever... the fact they won is testament to how trash the bills were (cant believe they went to the playoffs in stead of us) and how incredible the rest of the jags roster was/is
 
rossihunter2 said:
bortles vs the bills was one of the historic worst qb performances in a playoff game ever... the fact they won is testament to how trash the bills were (cant believe they went to the playoffs in stead of us) and how incredible the rest of the jags roster was/is
Click to expand...
But to be fair, Flacco had a, well, you-know-how-to-describe-it performance against the Pats in 2009 (my birthday mind you!). Bortles did follow-up with a solid performance against the Steelers.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top