I mean, we said the same about Joe Flacco so...Lamar era teams are so bad against the Steelers
Great pointWhen you can't depend on your kicker, what thought process goes on that not taking a knee into the half is a bad idea?!
His kicks keep banking to the left...it needs to be fixed pronto!@I really don't understand Tucket at this point. You would think they would have identified the issue by this game. If it was Stout & the LS, they would be replaced, I would think. That makes me think Justin Tucker is the problem. You can easily change holder or LS but not as easily change your kicker. Otherwise, I don't get why we haven't adjusted to these issues. It's been a problem all year. I will also say ST looks like shit. Constant pressure on all the kicks, I assume that may be contributing to the misses but maybe Tucker has no trust in the line so it's all mental, no idea. It has to get fixed, we can't keep doing this.
two knees then and run out the rest. We missed points with tucker and gave points with that bs. That's a 9 pt gift. Better than Vegas gives.There was 40 seconds left, no team is taking a knee with that much time left
When exactly were they aggressive? I do not think they played remotely aggressive at all at any point in that first half. Just the normal runs and passes but some of the passes were off, for reasons that are hard to see on the live feed. There was not a single aggressive 4th down call or crazy shot on 3rd and short, but instead just normal calls.A kicker with the yips and a HC that encourages aggressiveness over everything sensible is going to lose us this game.
Offensive penalties making Lamar's life not so easy. He has to try and force the issue, which is never a good thing.These guys play like bitches against the Steelers.
Especially the WR group typically.
Lamar hasn't looked particularly great either
I do not think ANY team in the NFL does that. I would expect the Browns would be more aggressive than that and they have either a blind man or a washed up rapist at QB (depending on who is their starter). If you are saying the number 1 offense in the league should be more conservative than the number 32 offense in the league than that is a case of wanting to be too conservative.two knees then and run out the rest. We missed points with tucker and gave points with that bs. That's a 9 pt gift. Better than Vegas gives.
I'd cut them bothSo, 14 and 29 as safties fixes our pass defense. That it took this fucking long to make that change is really starting to piss me off. A blind man could have seen that 32 and 39 should have been removed 5 weeks ago
I mean to be positive they were not on the field THAT much because they kept shutting down the Steelers offense quickly.Will be very impressive if the D can continue to hold on given how much they were on the field in the first half. Really need the offense to put together some solid drives.
just that last 40 secs. Harbs pulls that stupid shit and when it backfires, especially in these close games, his only lame answer is we were playing to win. Like the Bungles not tying the game the other night and playing in OT. That was just as dumb.When exactly were they aggressive? I do not think they played remotely aggressive at all at any point in that first half. Just the normal runs and passes but some of the passes were off, for reasons that are hard to see on the live feed. There was not a single aggressive 4th down call or crazy shot on 3rd and short, but instead just normal calls.