Oops, yes it is.Is it 4 (4) instead of 4 (2)?
Obviously 2 first round picks gone is a shame, but above all else the Raiders needed receivers, and though both aren’t exactly spring chickens they will do more than just solve the problem
No worries at all. Just wanted to make sure.Oops, yes it is.
Just took a quick glance at the SOF before posting so that’s on me
There you go again with a weak O line...The two trades of my OG's opens a hole in my O-line, but it helps a dire need along my D-Line, and helps me avoid KO's age and back issues
It’s a staple at this pointThere you go again with a weak O line...
lol, check your in box. I sent you a PM last nightIt’s a staple at this point
@Truth This is invalid - Cyprien is not a free agent, I traded him to CIN and he hasn't been cut subsequently.Tampa Bay Buccaneers
SS Johnathan Cyprien
4 Stars
Accurate. I've just removed the bid and removed Cyprien from the FA list. Great catch.@Truth This is invalid - Cyprien is not a free agent, I traded him to CIN and he hasn't been cut subsequently.
@Dom McRaven This is your fault for tendering that SS of yours. He would've been my top target otherwise. Damn you for making a good decision!
after 5 yrs of playing the FM, it's about time I have a team with cap space and I plan to blow it all!!!!!!!There was a part of me that was really considering not trading for Randall because of the 9 star salary... I think I made the right call after seeing these bids. My lord.
after 5 yrs of playing the FM, it's about time I have a team with cap space and I plan to blow it all!!!!!!!
maybe in the DB free agency
after 5 yrs of playing the FM, it's about time I have a team with cap space and I plan to blow it all!!!!!!!
maybe in the DB free agency