• Welcome to PurpleFlock! Sign up here so that you can chat with your fellow Ravens fans.

JoeyFlex Reaction Compilation

Simba said:
@JoeyFlex5 it’s almost your time to shine bro
Click to expand...
1713816490188.gif
 
Jacquouille said:
It kills me that we're being revisionnists about their two choices when litteraly one of them is barely seeing the field.
Click to expand...

and partly because they hit on some second rounders that no one was complaining about

Sam LaPorta was a great pick at the time
Brian Branch was a great pick at the time

it was jahmyrr gibbs (which we were clearly all wrong on and who's been a legit game-changing weapon) and jack campbell... who started 12 games but idk that id think of that as a home run pick at all...
 
rossihunter2 said:
RB
LB
TE
S
Click to expand...
Shit yup.

They took the 4 positions that all analytics say you shouldn’t take in the first unless you’re getting a certified stud.

Frankly I thought Campbell was the bad pick but he’s much better than I expected. And I think Dan Campbell was being a stubborn bonehead with Gibbs because he’s a rookie with a veteran lead back, the same way Harbaugh would always be a ball and chain to our young backs. I expect Gibbs to break out in major fashion soon
 
rossihunter2 said:
and partly because they hit on some second rounders that no one was complaining about

Sam LaPorta was a great pick at the time
Brian Branch was a great pick at the time

it was jahmyrr gibbs (which we were clearly all wrong on and who's been a legit game-changing weapon) and jack campbell... who started 12 games but idk that id think of that as a home run pick at all...
Click to expand...
And Gibbs was never a bad player, he was NUMBER FIVE on my board, positional value not included.

The problem with that pick had more to do with him being a RB which is a different debate. I don't think it's that much of a surprise that Gibbs is so good and it shouldn't change how the pick is viewed.
 
Jacquouille said:
And Gibbs was never a bad player, he was NUMBER FIVE on my board, positional value not included.

The problem with that pick had more to do with him being a RB which is a different debate. I don't think it's that much of a surprise that Gibbs is so good and it shouldn't change how the pick is viewed.
Click to expand...

idk i was a lot colder on Gibbs than most
clearly was wrong - and i think the way he's played has clearly changed how that pick should be viewed
 
JoeyFlex5 said:
Shit yup.

They took the 4 positions that all analytics say you shouldn’t take in the first unless you’re getting a certified stud.

Frankly I thought Campbell was the bad pick but he’s much better than I expected. And I think Dan Campbell was being a stubborn bonehead with Gibbs because he’s a rookie with a veteran lead back, the same way Harbaugh would always be a ball and chain to our young backs. I expect Gibbs to break out in major fashion soon
Click to expand...

pretty sure he already broke out second half of the season and playoffs
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top