• Welcome to PurpleFlock! Sign up here so that you can chat with your fellow Ravens fans.

Next Up: @Falcons

Who SHOULD start at QB for the Ravens @ Falcons

  • Lamar Jackson

    Votes: 36 85.7%

  • Joe Flacco

    Votes: 6 14.3%
  • Total voters
    42
  • Poll closed .
allblackraven said:
You appear very condescending, in addition to never admitting being wrong about something/anything/everything.
That's the most revealing sign of stupidity. I bet you scored 36+ on Wonderlic.
Click to expand...

I admit to being wrong all the time. The first time I saw someone try that bullshit narrative was on the same page where I had said previously I had never expected so much from one of our players and so little from another (its been awhile I wanna say it was Moore and PerrimanI was comparinv).

Considering that I laughed in my chair but forsome reason a couple people like you on this forum spout this bullshit as gospel despite all evidence to contrary.
 
JAAM said:
Difference is, Lamar opens up our offense way more than Flacco does. Look at the past weeks with Lamar as starter and that's your normal game for Flacco minus the running ability. I've said this before and I'll keep saying it; I'd rather Lamar have growing pains and make rookie mistakes rather than a 10 year Vet making the same rookie mistakes. Lamar gives us the best chance at winning down the stretch. Your boy Flacco is done. We'd be lucky to get a mid-rounder for him.
Click to expand...

I would completely agree IF I didn't think the Ravens still have Super Bowl aspirations and in that case I would put best player on field for the situation.

Maybe I'm too bold on what I think Ravens can do but I don't see a team with the Jags collapse that I go "nope Ravens cant beat them". That Saints game shows me what the team can do and can be if they get to playoffs.
 
Ludy51 said:
Sometimes I forget we all root for the same team...
Click to expand...

QB talk makes everyone so hostile and quick to resort to childish name calling. Its weird, no other position does this. We could debate what to do about secondary in offseason, or who should start between Young and Peanut, or about which pass rushers should get more time, and somehow those always stay civil, but we talk QBs and it gets personal instantly.
 
Adreme said:
QB talk makes everyone so hostile and quick to resort to childish name calling. Its weird, no other position does this. We could debate what to do about secondary in offseason, or who should start between Young and Peanut, or about which pass rushers should get more time, and somehow those always stay civil, but we talk QBs and it gets personal instantly.
Click to expand...

That's because in most those cases there is an objective view. For some reason when it gets to qb people have a problem doing so. Then someone usually tries to sneak diss someone to defend their opinion.
 
Adreme said:
QB talk makes everyone so hostile and quick to resort to childish name calling. Its weird, no other position does this. We could debate what to do about secondary in offseason, or who should start between Young and Peanut, or about which pass rushers should get more time, and somehow those always stay civil, but we talk QBs and it gets personal instantly.
Click to expand...

i mean you're probably misremembering
there's been plenty of name-calling and bad-faith debating over the years about plenty other positions - perriman and marlon immediately spring to mind (CJ in a way too)
 
Adreme said:
I'm guilty of buying into him before that disastrous season. I figured he was healthy and would step up, but he never could run the right route (and he had Crab hands)
Click to expand...
lol
upload_2018-11-29_15-27-9.jpeg
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top