I'd rather have Marshall than MooreI wouldn’t mind Marshall at the 1st pick as long as it wasn’t instead of Bateman or Elijah Moore - that would truly hurt me lol
but if those guys were gone and Marshall’s our first pick I wouldn’t have a problem with it - would feel to me a lot like how it would have felt taking tee Higgins last year
I'd rather have Marshall than Moore
Since Marshall is the topic today I’ll share my irrelevant thoughts: last night I went down a YouTube rabbit hole which lead to me watching college highlights on Lamar and couldn’t help but notice he seemed comfortable putting the ball up for 50/50 balls to his Louisville wideouts. Those guys all seemed to be big guys however, 6’2+ and this led me to thinking... does Lamar do this often in the NFL? Yes, He trust Mark Andrews in these situations and Willie to a lesser extent. Anyways, as I continued down this rabbit hole I landed on Terrace Marshall film and he was winning in those situations consistently. Now, I’ve been against Marshall being the pick at 27 (admittedly because I’m infatuated with Bateman) but I’m coming around to the idea and would honestly be excited to add his skill set to the offense.
What’s your guys thoughts on him as a prospect? His fit in the offense?
- Seahawks trade out of the 1st round and if they can't, they'll make a very weird pick
Bruh i was coming here to say this lmaoo.. man i do not like marshall at allHave a pretty bad feeling terrace Marshall is our first pick.
I think the ravens pick 3 times on day 2
Creed Humphrey won't make it to 27
Pittsburghwho do you think takes him
Pittsburgh
Jenkins is certainly possible and I would list Zaven Collins as an outside possibility but I would be pretty surprised to see them take Dickerson. Not sure you want to replace your pro bowl center with a guy who has managed to not finish four out of five seasons with injury while your QB is on his way out.that's certainly possible - but so many are talking about them taking a RB (harris if he's there), or Jenkins or Dickerson
The issue I have with taking Creed that high is that it still leaves a hole at LG. I'm not sure if Bozeman is the answer at LG and I think its probably best he gets moved to center. I'm hoping the Ravens trade both of their first round picks and acquire more capital and address the line, specifically with guys like Wyatt Davis and Walker Little. Davis is a Zeitler clone. He just does not lose his blocks. Little on the other hand we have not seen him play in almost 2 years, but given our scheme he'll be placed in favorable matchups. Signing Dennis Kelly while having Walker Little develop is probably the best approach.who do you think takes him
The issue I have with taking Creed that high is that it still leaves a hole at LG. I'm not sure if Bozeman is the answer at LG and I think its probably best he gets moved to center. I'm hoping the Ravens trade both of their first round picks and acquire more capital and address the line, specifically with guys like Wyatt Davis and Walker Little. Davis is a Zeitler clone. He just does not lose his blocks. Little on the other hand we have not seen him play in almost 2 years, but given our scheme he'll be placed in favorable matchups. Signing Dennis Kelly while having Walker Little develop is probably the best approach.
The way I look at it is that just because you are a starter at a position doesn't mean you are good. I think he's been the starter at LG because he was the best player on the roster. The line is as good as its weakest link. I'm of the mindset that 3 positions on the o-line need an upgrade (LG, C, RT). Moving Bozeman back to his natural center position can solve one of the issues. He just needs to be average at the position for it to be an upgrade. I have a feeling the coaching staff looks at it the same way.why would you have more confidence in bozeman at C than at LG where he's played for 3 years as a pro? (2 of which as a starter)
also just on a straight BPA approach, i have creed humphrey well ahead of wyatt davis on my board (who i like)
walker little's a risk - he's got some really good tape but he's also just not played for 2 years - there'll be guys i have far more confidence in available if/when we might pick him...
The way I look at it is that just because you are a starter at a position doesn't mean you are good. I think he's been the starter at LG because he was the best player on the roster. The line is as good as its weakest link. I'm of the mindset that 3 positions on the o-line need an upgrade (LG, C, RT). Moving Bozeman back to his natural center position can solve one of the issues. He just needs to be average at the position for it to be an upgrade. I have a feeling the coaching staff looks at it the same way.