RavensDFan
Veteran
Marty couldn't scheme his way out of a paperbag if someone gave him a sharp knife.Wait. 30 seconds left and we need 40 yard? Draw play and screen hell yea!
Marty couldn't scheme his way out of a paperbag if someone gave him a sharp knife.Wait. 30 seconds left and we need 40 yard? Draw play and screen hell yea!
We could have just kneeled and went to half time. Like they were going to go down field with dump off passes.
Lol, this is trueMarty couldn't scheme his way out of a paperbag if someone gave him a sharp knife.
Yes! I rate B. Williams, Mosley, Suggs, J. Smith, Stanley, Tucker and Yanda in that category.The problem with the ravens?
Our best players are by nfl standards '' Good''
not great
By the time it works it will be 4th quarter with 3 mins left and meanwhile our defense will have given up a couple TDs. The Vikes actually have a good defense. In case you were wondering, this is what a good defense with a good DC looks like.I would like to see us run more. It might not be working now but eventually it will if you can just get carries for positive yards and manage to stay on the field. Soon enough the defense will break down, that's why you keep running the ball. Last week Chicago's run game really wasn't do much until that 53 yard run by Jordan Howard, once you keep running the ball eventually you get a big run.
Yes! I rate B. Williams, Mosley, Suggs, J. Smith, Stanley, Tucker and Yanda in that category.
Yes! I rate B. Williams, Mosley, Suggs, J. Smith, Stanley, Tucker and Yanda in that category.
Ok so let me get this straight, you don't believe that a failing offense that repeatedly sends the defense back out after multiple 3 and outs can be to blame for a defense suddenly regressing mid game? They haven't allowed a TD, they have a turnover, they were playing a very good game until late in the second after a series of hideous drives by the offense, and you think what happened is that our defense suddenly said "fuck it we're gonna stop playing good"? You don't think that giving the offense that many tries might allow them to get into a rhythm and figure out some nuances of our defense?lmao No sorry. Other than the long Vikes drive THEY ALLOWED THEMSELVES, they were NOT ON THE FIELD LONGER THAN THE VIKES DEFENSE. It does not work that way. They still were only on the field for ONE PLAY with that turnover.
Win or lose we have to just open it up. Our receiving corps is what it is (thanks Ozzie & Co!).even with a depleted receiver corps i think our offense looks the same. still a majority of screen passes. boring as usual
Do a quarterback swap?TRade for LUCK TRADE FOR LUCK. Lmfao
I read somewhere that the Colts should trade him, wtf??
Atleast we aren’t being anialated
The Vikes offense did the exact same thing until our defense allowed them that long drive. That is the point. No one is blaming the defense but they also don't get a pass. They and no one else, allowed that long drive.Ok so let me get this straight, you don't believe that a failing offense that repeatedly sends the defense back out after multiple 3 and outs can be to blame for a defense suddenly regressing mid game? They haven't allowed a TD, they have a turnover, they were playing a very good game until late in the second after a series of hideous drives by the offense, and you think what happened is that our defense suddenly said "fuck it we're gonna stop playing good"? You don't think that giving the offense that many tries might allow them to get into a rhythm and figure out some nuances of our defense?
So the defense is to blame here for being down, because they suddenly dropped their level of play which was totally independent of themselves...