I think it was week 10 of 2016? vs the browns losing 6-7wait actually - what is the last game we won after losing at half?
I think it was week 10 of 2016? vs the browns losing 6-7wait actually - what is the last game we won after losing at half?
Nope, we won so it's not a big gameSo we beat the 5-2 division leading colts on the road in a game that will almost certainly mean a lot for the wild card race, but we can't win big games right?
Apparently DeCosta held a speech during halftime - and it worked. Dude's amazing
I think it was week 10 of 2016? vs the browns losing 6-7
I'm not sure if it's true, that's also why I wrote "apparently".This is a joke or what?
That's one of the things analytics stresses the most right? Passing on first down is usually more efficient.
I wanted us to continue to build on those offensive series, because it is clear whatever go into Lamar to start the half worked. We marched right down the field before that Gus fumble. Then proceeded to score on the next 2 drives with ease. I believe Lamar was perfect or almost perfect on those 3 drives. I know we only had 2 offensive drives after that but considering how much we struggled recently I felt like letting them play would help.
Well, in fairness, analytics would tell you that pretty much no team in the league throws it enough. Like a lot of us joke about how its a passing league and some teams just laughably abandon the run, but even those teams are pretty far away from achieving "max efficiency" when it comes to play calling.That's one of the things analytics stresses the most right? Passing on first down is usually more efficient.
wait actually - what is the last game we won after losing at half?
holy shitI think it was week 10 of 2016? vs the browns losing 6-7
Going by EPA this is actually true.Well, in fairness, analytics would tell you that pretty much no team in the league throws it enough. Like a lot of us joke about how its a passing league and some teams just laughably abandon the run, but even those teams are pretty far away from achieving "max efficiency" when it comes to play calling.
Ironically, while you are correct that basically all of the analytics suggest passing on first down is optimal, they would also suggest that running on 3rd down, even as far out as 8-10 yards, is actually optimal.
Going by EPA this is actually true.
![]()
Going by success rate this still holds
![]()
I think last season was an anomaly. Here are the numbers for 1st down. In both seasons we're top 3 in rushing rate.
2019: run rate on 1st down: 62%; 5.2 YPC; 17% 1st down rate; Passing: 25% 1st down rate and 6.9 YPA
2020: run rate on 1st down: 65%; 3.9 YPC; 12% 1st down rate; Passing: 38% 1st down rate and 8.5 YPA
Although the perception is that we're clearly worse than last year, the numbers suggest otherwise. Our passing offense is much improved. What sets us back for 2nd and 3rd down is that we gain 1.3 yards less per rush on 1st down. Also, to all the "run the ball more" crowd out there: we're running the ball even more than last year - it's just not as efficient as last year. It actually limits what we can call on 2nd and 3rd down. The 2019 numbers also show that passing is more efficient than rushing even though we had the best rushing offense in NFL history.