Search results

My crazy self saw them call her Starlight and was like "she doesnt look like her at all... and I thought that was Erin Moriarty".

So the Browns are winning 4 games.

I mean they gave away a very easy first 6 games so by consequence the last 10 are going to be rough (I dont know what the Bengals will be).

That is a rough start. First game against the team that owns you and second game against possibly the most talented team in the NFL.

I mean TNF usually gets the 5th or 6th best game at best. Meanwhile the SNF game is 2 big market teams in a rivalry division game (that will get ratings) and the MNF game is the reigning Super Bowl champions against a lot of people's sexy pick to go to the Super Bowl next year with the QB...

We do not know if both G spots have been upgraded. We know one went from bad to mediocre and the other is a 1st round rookie. Maybe he is good. Maybe he is no better than what existed last season and is bottom 5. He has 0 NFL snaps so I am not willing to say one way or the other. I do know...

I mean I think its bold to say the OLine will be better because they signed a mediocre starter and drafted a rookie but lost a top 5 C. If the OLine is as good as last year that will exceed expectations.

He has played 5 full NFL seasons and is entering year 6. Its past the point where "flashes" are okay. Either he has it or he doesn't and if its the latter its time to move on.

Having a deal and someone backing off is a different kettle of fish then the coach pushing for a particular player instead (though I would have taken Bain). Though considering the Ravens pick and the next 2 were the players they seemingly wanted... its probably for the best they did not make...

Wasn't he the guy completely insufferable in interviews both with teams and the public or am I thinking of another guy?

I certainly hope so. I know I am the boards number 1 Bateman hater but I think at this point I finally have some company in that camp.

I mean the first 2 picks were 2 places they needed starters at and then next ones have been for areas where the Ravens needed depth. I dont know how they will pan out but if you listed the needs before the draft then this checks them.

So basically they drafted a fresh Kolar and Likely to develop into the roles by year 2.

Well if he can make plays against Pitt then he is already in my good books.

If there was a single player available who could fill those holes on day 1 they would have been drafted by now. There is not a day 1 starter available because those are taken in rounds 1 and 2.

I mean that's mostly because the picks the Ravens made left. You cant expect to fill holes with day 3 picks. You try to find prospects who can hopefully provide solid depth and if you are lucky they can compete for a starting job in 2-3 years.

Day 3 is about finding whatever prospects you think you can make into a real NFL player and if they are good that is a bonus.

I mean everyone kept saying the Ravens need depth and I guess using 11 picks is how you get depth.

The funniest part to me was the GM having the reaction "its just words on a piece of paper". Those words are basically the contract that guides the team so its a little more than just words. Edit: also its not that uncommon as others have noted. When you are a consensus top 5 coach you can...

I think 40 times are overrated already but I genuinely cannot imagine caring even a little about the 40 time of my TE.