The entire reason you debate over a backup QB for a contender is that scenario I am listing. The only reason they matter is if your QB misses a month (possible as only about 1/3 of QBs play all 17 games/16 games and rest last) and you need to stay above water. They dont matter in terms of...
It doesn’t matter. Every single team you listed is irrelevant and not a playoff team with their backup. It doesn’t change the fact that every contender is irrelevant if their starting QB goes down.
The only interesting conversation is which team is most likely to go 2-2 if their QB has to miss...
What contender is not a QB injury away from being irrelevant? At least the Rams have a freshly drafted backup plan which is more than every other contender can say.
I mean the fact that the few times they do pick they hit homeruns would almost suggest they should covet them more than other teams but it does sort of work for them. Also considering Stafford only has a couple years left they should go all in now.
Even if they dont hit on the picks the team is better aligned then it was. The team's timeline and Garrett's timeline were not the same. The team is 3 years from being ready which better aligns with Verse then it does with Garrett. Now yes they of course need a QB but they are about to be...
Its certainly okay for the Ravens this year. The problem is the Browns were not going to be good this year no matter what. They probably were not going to be good next year. By the time they were likely to be a real football team in 3 years, Garrett was likely not going to be elite anymore...
Because he is an aging player whose price tag is too high. He will be on a roster once his number comes down. If somehow the AJ Brown thing doesn’t happen I expect the Pats would bring him back.
Which brings us back to the only complaint over him being that he likes to have sex with a lot of people, and as of now seemingly all of it was consensual. If that is the red flag then half the NFL needs to be out of the league. If there is actually something that shows him to be a bad...
To circle around though if he won the lawsuit then that means the jury found that the allegations did not happen. Therefore the poor behavior did not happen.
Anyone can sue anyone. Whether it’s true or not is left up to a jury. So basically the only bad behavior is existing for him so far is...
I mean winning a lawsuit means I am not going to hold it against him as that is what it means to win.
If the biggest vice people have on the guy is that he likes to have sex then I think we are trying too hard to make him into something he is not.
Yes but this falls into the same trap that bad teams do in that they just try and copy what the last team to win had. Saying "oh well these teams arent good at it so we dont need to be good at it" is how the bad organizations are run. The way to win in the NFL has always been the same: get...
Are we really going to call into attention the Ravens ability to evaluate WRs? Its not a very pretty picture. I would trust most other teams and their evaluations before I went with the Ravens.
Its also unrelated as Tate was considered that guy by just about everyone to the point where the...
I also dont put a ton of stock in rookies but I do assume that a highly rated top 5 pick considered the best prospect at his position will be better than one of the worst number 2s in the league. In the same vein I also assume Vega (and Simpson who will be playing RG) will be better than both...
For most teams he is their number 3. Even your list of teams you think dont have better I would disagree heavily with several. Just as an example I would easily take both the Titans top 2 WRs over Bateman and its not close. Im going to just assume you forgot that they drafted Tate, who I would...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.